The Magic Café Forum Index [ F.A.Q. ]
[ Magic Café Donations ]
Username:
Password:
 
  
  [ Lost Password ]
  [ Forgot Username ]
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » The workers » » Double-undercut question... Printer Friendly Version
MagicofDesperado

Veteran user

357 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 10:08pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of MagicofDesperado  

In a trick I'm reading, the procedure calls for moving the top three cards of the deck into 2nd, third and fourth from the bottom. In the trick explanation it states to obtain a pinky break over the bottom card with a pull-down and double undercut the top three cards so they wind up in said position. I must be having a long day and tbh, don't use the double-undercut that much....but can't for the life of me figure this out with no cards in my hand LOL...can someone point me in the right direction:)


Thanks,
Dave
FrenchDrop

Inner circle
I can name that tune in
1662 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 10:21pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of FrenchDrop  

Hm. I have a deck handy.

If your three target cards are on top and you catch a pb above the bottom card, you can do a normal cut and hold the b***k with your thumb, then follow with a double undercut to get the three target cards second, third, and fourth from the *top* of the deck. If you started with the deck face-up, with the three target cards on the face of the deck, got a pb above the card on the bottom of the face-down deck, then did the above, *then* turned the deck face-down, you'd end up with the three target cards second, third, and fourth from the bottom.

That's all I can figure.

"A great magician has said of his profession that its practitioners '… must pound and rack their brains to make the least learning go in, but quarrelling always comes very naturally to them.'” -- Susanna Clarke, Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
Alel

Special user
Philippines
665 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 10:27pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of Alel  

The only way I can make it work from what you are saying is doing the pinky pull-down of one card as instructed, cutting off the top three cards with the other hand, and undercutting the bottom 'half' to the top but ensuring that the three cards goes above the pinky break. Not a double undercut action, but a single undercut.

http://www.artfulartifice.com
Steven Youell

V.I.P.

3866 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 10:30pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of Steven Youell  

Quote:

On 2012-04-25 22:08, MagicofDesperado wrote:
In a trick I'm reading, the procedure calls for moving the top three cards of the deck into 2nd, third and fourth from the bottom.


Do those three cards have to be in a specific order after you move them to those positions?

SEY

The Best Close Up Mats In The World
Engali

Veteran user

309 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 10:40pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of Engali  

Just get a break under the top four and then double undercut.

Does the bottom card before the double undercut need to remain the bottom card after you do the move?
Steven Youell

V.I.P.

3866 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 10:43pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of Steven Youell  

Quote:

On 2012-04-25 22:40, Engali wrote:
Just get a break under the top four and then double undercut.
Does the bottom card before the double undercut need to remain the bottom card after you do the move?


That would have been my suggestion as well, but that won't work if the cards have to be in a particular order. That's why I asked.

SEY

The Best Close Up Mats In The World
FrenchDrop

Inner circle
I can name that tune in
1662 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 10:46pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of FrenchDrop  

If the order of the cards doesn't matter, you could get there with one quick overhand shuffle.

"A great magician has said of his profession that its practitioners '… must pound and rack their brains to make the least learning go in, but quarrelling always comes very naturally to them.'” -- Susanna Clarke, Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
magician8

Veteran user

379 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 10:46pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of magician8  

Catch a break under the top three cards, start a dobule undercut but do a pinky pulldown, putting all of the cards in the left hand except the bottom card on top of the ones in the right hand. Repeat and voila.
MagicofDesperado

Veteran user

357 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 11:25pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of MagicofDesperado  

Can't do the break under the top four as the fourth card needs to remain in place on top of the deck.

Magician8...I'm not clear on your exact procedure...do you mean you slide all the cards on top save the bottom card that remains in the left hand?

Dave
MagicofDesperado

Veteran user

357 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 11:28pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of MagicofDesperado  

Here's the exact text I'm reading from....."As you make these claims while looking directly at the spectator, execute
the following actions: Pull Down the bottom card with your left pinky and
perform a Double Undercut to maneuver the top three cards of the deck
to the bottom and above the bottom card. Consequently, they end up
second, third and fourth from the bottom. "

Dave
magician8

Veteran user

379 Posts
Posted: Apr 25, 2012 11:35pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of magician8  

Quote:

On 2012-04-25 23:25, MagicofDesperado wrote:
Can't do the break under the top four as the fourth card needs to remain in place on top of the deck.

Magician8...I'm not clear on your exact procedure...do you mean you slide all the cards on top save the bottom card that remains in the left hand?

Dave



Exactly, a Marlo little finger pulldown. You cut the deck and retain the bottom one via the pulldown, and since it's a double undercut, you do it twice.
Hideo Kato

Inner circle
Tokyo
5579 Posts
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 12:30am    Reply with quote   View Profile of Hideo Kato  

Totally you do Triple Under Cut, not Double Under Cut.
You insert top three cards above bottom card when you do first cut.

Hideo Kato
MagicofDesperado

Veteran user

357 Posts
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 12:39am    Reply with quote   View Profile of MagicofDesperado  

So if I'm reading you right.

I have a break on the top three cards. I pull off the first bottom chunk with a pinky break on the bottom card. That card goes ba k to the bottom as I slide everything else in my left hand over the too cards and do that twice. I see.
Thx
Dave
Uli Weigel

Inner circle
Berlin, Germany
1306 Posts
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 5:45am    Reply with quote   View Profile of Uli Weigel  

Don't do a double or triple cut at all. Instead perform a bluff transfer cut like this: Establish a break under the top three cards. While the right hand takes the three cards in a closed biddle grip, the left hand buckles the bottom card. The right hand feeds the cut cards into the break and you're done. The action looks like a simple regular cut. If you do this rather briskly, without hesitation and without looking, it's very hard to see that you're not moving half the deck but only three cards.
MagicofDesperado

Veteran user

357 Posts
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 12:07pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of MagicofDesperado  

Good suggestion Uli. In fact it's weird perhaps that your method wasn't the one used as after researching it a bit, in another trick Sadowitz uses that same ruse but with one card.

Cheers,

Dave
Justin W.

Loyal user

222 Posts
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 12:17pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of Justin W.  

That handling was already suggested, by Alel.

In terms of efficiency, it's your straightest option.
Uli Weigel

Inner circle
Berlin, Germany
1306 Posts
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 12:47pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of Uli Weigel  

Oh sorry. I must have overlooked Alel's post. Anyway, that method does the job adequately and without fumbling or excess handling.
MagicofDesperado

Veteran user

357 Posts
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 2:04pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of MagicofDesperado  

Yes I just noticed that Alel had said the same thing. Kudos for all the help.

Dave
Hideo Kato

Inner circle
Tokyo
5579 Posts
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 6:41pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of Hideo Kato  

Single cut is most clear that I have cut the deck. So I would use single cut if it fits the context of the routine. Triple gut looks like I am mixing the cards. So I would use triple cut if it fits the context of the routine.

Hideo Kato
MagicJuggler

Special user
Anchorage, AK
918 Posts
Posted: Apr 27, 2012 9:38am    Reply with quote   View Profile of MagicJuggler  

I think the description as you quoted it was missing some details, thus the obvious confusion. I would think the move as described, doesn't really work too well if you want the bottom card to stay the bottom at least without some extra move thrown in. Why not just arrainge the card so the intended bottom card starts fourth from the top, then get a break under four cards and double undercut to the bottom? There's dozens of ways of arrainging the cards as you need, but that's the easiest way of integrating the double undercut that I can think of.

Matthew Olsen
www.mattolsenmagic.com

I heard from a friend that anecdotal evidence is actually quite reliable.
MagicofDesperado

Veteran user

357 Posts
Posted: Apr 27, 2012 7:15pm    Reply with quote   View Profile of MagicofDesperado  

In the context of this routine the single cut makes the most sense to me.

Thanks for all the input!

Dave
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » The workers » » Double-undercut question...
<<< Previous Topic Top of Page Next Topic >>>

POST A REPLY
About Posting: Only Registered users can post replies in this forum
Username:
Password:
I forgot my password!
Message:

Options: Disable BBcode on this Post
Disable Smilies on this Post
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » The workers » » Double-undercut question...

[ Top of Page ]

All content & postings Copyright © 2001- 2013 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved.
This page was created in 1.264706 seconds, requiring 9 database queries.

The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café
are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic.