On 2005-07-18 17:52, bobser wrote:
Nice write up Drew. Well done. Do keep us informed. TV programmes have been made with much worse ideas!!!

Bobser

"In the popular imagination, a person who submits to hypnosis falls into a trance. The subject slavishly follows the hypnotist's commands, perhaps to squawk like a chicken, re-enact events from childhood or develop a lasting aversion to cigarettes. When the subject "awakens," he or she forgets everything that happened during the session.

Actually, hypnosis is not like that at all, said Steven Lynn, professor of psychology at Binghamton University, who has devoted much of his career to establishing a clear, scientific understanding of hypnotic suggestion. A person who responds well to hypnosis takes an active rather than a passive role, working in partnership with the hypnotist. "Hypnosis involves the participant thinking and imagining along with whatever is suggested, in an expectant manner," he said."

On 2005-07-14 11:26, themindreader wrote:
Hi,

I really don't see any ethical problem here at all (providing that the subjects are not literally children but teenagers).

Simon

On 2005-07-25 00:56, jimtron wrote:
But I'm not saying hypnotizing children is ok. I don't know if it is or not. I've been asking: what specifically is inherently wrong (if anything) with hypnotizing kids? You said it's wrong because the kids could get teased; but (I think) we agreed it wasn't the hypnosis that was directly at fault, it was that *if* a hypnotist puts the kids in embarrasing situations, then they *might* get teased by other kids. That could also happen if a child becomes a Mathlete, or participates in a spelling bee. But I don't think anyone would argue that being a Mathlete is amoral.

Of course it's not ok for MJ to sleep with children just because he thinks it's ok. I don't think you're going to get too many arguments on that point.

I feel like I'm beating a dead horse here, but I haven't gotten too many responses: what is inherently wrong (if anything) with hypnotizing children?

Do you all agree with Jordan that hypnotizing children is humiliating and causes psychological damage? If so, please explain how that happens. And again; Lee has apparently hypnotized children with no problems, and Josh has witnessed the hypnosis of children with no problems. Does anyone have evidence that hypnotizing children is amoral, or dangerous, etc.?

thanks,

Jim

On 2005-07-25 21:49, jimtron wrote:
"I'm still wondering, is it *inherently* wrong to hypnotize a kid. In other words, let's say the parents gave permission, the hypnotist is sensitive and kind, there's no coercion, he's not ridiculing or insulting anyone, only his parents and close friends are there, etc. What is inherent in hypnosis that will humiliate and pscyhologically damage a child?"

On 2005-07-26 13:36, joshlondon wrote:
See, I think this is very interesting. I asked the question above yesterday and only 2 people respond. Come on, there are 4 pages of why hypnotizing kids is bad, yet no one can stand up and say, "I am a hypnotist."?

I realize this is a forum where we can ask questions and answer at will, however, I do think that when it comes to something like this your answers need to be validated with some kind of experience in hypnosis, not just, "Oh, this seems like an interesting topic." Because when it all comes down to it, it is our own opinion about the matter.

It seems like I struck a chord with this question that resulted in 4 pages of answers from people who know a little about hypnosis or nothing at all. I think I could hae been better off asking, "Are you for or against abortion?"

On 2005-07-26 15:41, Dannydoyle wrote:
Now it is time to say something. First of all I can say hypnotising children at even the age of 10 is bad. I can say this for the same reason I can say murder is bad. I am not a murderer, but I can sure see it as bad.

As it works out I am a hypnotist, not clinical, I don't want the long term responsability, only entertainment. I offer no CD's only a show and some t-shirts. the line is quite clear for me black and white.

Hypnosis is wrong for children if for no other reason than your darned insurance policy! From a business standpoint you would have to be a complete buffoon to use children under 18.

From a law standpoint they can not enter into a contract legally. Period. This is what the age of majority is all about. YOU can be in huge trouble if something happnes to them as simple as tripping on a chair. Let alone if you end up with hysterical reactions. These can be dealt with in adults a LOT easier than children. Manifistations of deep seeded fears and such, are tough to deal with if you have to talk to them in what someone else suggested was "Their language".

My gut feeling is that this post is at least 1/2 bull. It seems to me your client does not have $2,500 to spend for 10 year olds. Even if they did, it would not be. It makes no sense. I think you found a market nobody else is actually in and want to see if it is a good idea to venture forth. Well the answer is no.

If the post is real the money is not worth it to say the least.

Just my 2 cents

Danny

I'm a full time stage hypnotist and I think you're asking for trouble. TEN YEAR OLD KIDS? You don't find a problem with that?

I also have a problem believing that your client has a $2500 budget.