|
|
Martin Pulman Inner circle London 3399 Posts |
I don't know if the old Berglas effect still holds people in thrall as it did last year (don't fads in mentalism pass quick these days).
If so, would anyone consider the following to be an interesting presentation, or would it be too much work? If anyone thinks it's viable I may release it. Spectator names any card. Spectator names any number from 1 to 52. Spectator counts to named card at named position. Compromises: Deck would not be on display at start without a switch. 3(three)decks are used, although the spectator is aware of only one. Spectator would not always be able to remove cards from box. A crib is required. Any thoughts? |
Dr Spektor Eternal Order Carcanis 10781 Posts |
Hey Martin, you should toss in the link to the Bill Nagler MD thread in Effects - but I haven't the heart to do it on this post...
"They are lean and athirst!!!!"
|
Martin Pulman Inner circle London 3399 Posts |
Dr,
That thread on Bill Nagler MD's ACETAANET is one of the oddest I've ever read, and in fact has resulted in my first experience of having posts removed by the moderators!?! It made me feel all James Deanesque and rebellish.. |
Dr Spektor Eternal Order Carcanis 10781 Posts |
Or the ACAICTCTETANACTISU effect more precisely (and that acronym is a reflection on the clean presentation )
"They are lean and athirst!!!!"
|
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Penny for your thoughts » » ACAAN (0 Likes) |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.01 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |