The Magic Caf
Username:
Password:
[ Lost Password ]
  [ Forgot Username ]
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Magical equations » » Calculate phone number (0 Likes) Printer Friendly Version

inidyls
View Profile
Veteran user
NYC
315 Posts

Profile of inidyls
A friend and I were talking last night about math and magic. It's amazing what happens when you mix the two together. So we were thinking way back to some oldies and here's and old one you might remember.
1. use the first 3 digits of your phone #
2. multiply by 80
3. add 1
4. multiply by 250
5. now add the last 4 digits of your #
6. repeat step 5 again
7. subtract 250
8. now divide by 2

That's just one of the many math tricks we remembered.
There's a lot of good ones.
Necromancer
View Profile
Inner circle
Chicago
3067 Posts

Profile of Necromancer
There are certainly a lot of them -- but a lot of good ones?
Creator of The Xpert (20 PAGES of reviews!) and the Hands-Off Multiple ESP System ("Quality and design far exceed any ESP cards on the market"-Genii), and contributor to the ebook GOLD: When It HAS To Be Performance GOLD -- all at Penguin.
gibby357
View Profile
Veteran user
The Woodlands, TX
344 Posts

Profile of gibby357
You guys must like math. I was with you upto the point where I had to multiply. When you ask for someone to think of their own phone number, that is good, you have made it personal. When you ask them to multiply that by 80 you are making them work. When you then request that they multiply by 250 some will be going to the bathroom or striking up a conversation with the cute blonde sitting next to them. I won't even go any further. I am sure the picture is becoming quite clear.............


gibby
kihei kid
View Profile
Inner circle
Dog House
1039 Posts

Profile of kihei kid
For what it's worth, I liked it Inidyls.
In loving memory of Hughie Thomasson 1952-2007.

You brought something beautiful to this world, you touched my heart, my soul and my life. You will be greatly missed.

Until we meet again “my old friend”.
J.Warrens
View Profile
Inner circle
Canada
1098 Posts

Profile of J.Warrens
Greetings!
That is a very nifty thing! Not something I'd use but definitely a fun bit to play with. Thanks for sharing>
Cheers,
J.Warrens
landmark
View Profile
Inner circle
within a triangle
5156 Posts

Profile of landmark
Check out the Magical Equations forum for some excellent thinking from some very clever minds concerning math based effects and presentations that win over even people who dislike math.

But then again, maybe we'll just keep it our little secret . . .

Jack Shalom
Lee Darrow
View Profile
V.I.P.
Chicago, IL USA
3588 Posts

Profile of Lee Darrow
Inasmuch as I have what amounts to a dyslexia about math, anything that makes me have to dig out a calculator is NOT going to play in my head very well.

Heck, I even force a CARD to get the letter when doing the Grey Elephant in Denmark routine!

As Michael Ammar said - use the KISS principle - Keep It Slogan Simple.

But it does show nome very nice thinking. Keep that up, by all means!

Lee Darrow, C.Ht.
http://www.leedarrow.com
http://www.leedarrow.com
<BR>"Because NICE Matters!"
MichelAsselin
View Profile
Veteran user
20th century, 3rd dimension
326 Posts

Profile of MichelAsselin
Quote:
...anything that makes me have to dig out a calculator is NOT going to play in my head very well.

Lee Darrow, C.Ht.
http://www.leedarrow.com


Lee, keep your mind open to the fact that a great many people do lug an electronic agenda of some form with them these days... THEY will provide the calculator.
" , ? ; !!! "
- Marcel Marceau, Feb 30, 1945.
Chout
View Profile
New user
52 Posts

Profile of Chout
Quote:
On 2003-11-12 08:32, gibby357 wrote:
You guys must like math. I was with you upto the point where I had to multiply. When you ask for someone to think of their own phone number, that is good, you have made it personal. When you ask them to multiply that by 80 you are making them work. When you then request that they multiply by 250 some will be going to the bathroom or striking up a conversation with the cute blonde sitting next to them. I won't even go any further. I am sure the picture is becoming quite clear.............

gibby


Funny but sadly true. Unless I already have a calculator nearby, I'd probably ignore someone who pulled this trick on me.
Nir Dahan
View Profile
Inner circle
Munich, Germany
1390 Posts

Profile of Nir Dahan
In many math routines the real trick is to turn it into an interesting piece of performance. unfortunatelly sometimes it is just not possible - as in the effect above...
wayman
View Profile
Special user
England - Sunderland
588 Posts

Profile of wayman
I just don't get it....call me DOH!!!


Quote:
1. use the first 3 digits of your phone #
2. multiply by 80
3. add 1
4. multiply by 250
5. now add the last 4 digits of your #
6. repeat step 5 again
7. subtract 250
8. now divide by 2


What is this supposed to achieve???
does this only work with american phone numbers??
Scott Cram
View Profile
Inner circle
2678 Posts

Profile of Scott Cram
Quote:
On 2003-12-28 09:10, wayman wrote:
I just don't get it....call me DOH!!!


Quote:
1. use the first 3 digits of your phone #
2. multiply by 80
3. add 1
4. multiply by 250
5. now add the last 4 digits of your #
6. repeat step 5 again
7. subtract 250
8. now divide by 2


What is this supposed to achieve???
does this only work with american phone numbers??



With any 7-digit phone number, the answer will be the phone number itself. I imagine that the division by 2 is supposed to be done by the "mathemagician" without the spectator knowing about it.

If you call the first three digits of your phone number "X", and the last four digits of your phone number "Y", then here's what happens:

1. x
2. 80x
3. 80x+1
4. 20,000x+250
5. 20,000x+250+y
6. 20,000x+250+2y
7. 20,000x+2y
8. 10,000x+y

"10,000x" merely takes the 3-digit number that is x, and places it in front of the four-digit number that is y, resulting in the phone number.

Quote:
On 2003-12-28 07:43, Nir Dahan wrote:
In many math routines the real trick is to turn it into an interesting piece of performance. unfortunatelly sometimes it is just not possible - as in the effect above...


I don't know. How about introducing it as, "Did I ever tell you how I used to pick up girls at M.I.T.? First, I'd use my best opening lines, such as 'Let's convert our potential energy to kinetic energy' or 'Since distance equals velocity times time, let's let velocity or time approach infinity, because I want to go all the way with you'. Then, I'd get their phone number in this way . . ."

"Oh, you're wondering how things went with that M.I.T. girl? We integrated from the very point of origin. Her curves were continuous, and even though I was odd, I was a real number. The day our lines first intersected, we became an ordered pair. From then on it was a continuous function. We were both in our prime, so in next to no time we were horizontal and parallel. She was awed by the magnitude of my perpendicular line, and I was amazed by her conical projections. "Bisect my angle!" she postulated each time she reached her local maximum. I taught her the chain rule as she implicitly defined the amplitude of my simple harmonic motion. We underwent multiple rotations of our axes, until at last we reached the vertex, the critical point, our finite limit. After that we slept like logs. Later, she found me taking a right-handed limit, that was a problem, because it was an improper form. I meanwhile had realized that she was irrational, not to mention square. She approached her ex, so we diverged."
Smile
landmark
View Profile
Inner circle
within a triangle
5156 Posts

Profile of landmark
Hilarious Scott, thanks.


Jack Shalom
Chout
View Profile
New user
52 Posts

Profile of Chout
You guys crack me up.
Btw, I never knew this:
1. x
2. 80x
3. 80x+1
4. 20,000x+250
5. 20,000x+250+y
6. 20,000x+250+2y
7. 20,000x+2y
8. 10,000x+y
Thanx for explaining Scott.
Dennis Loomis
View Profile
1943 - 2013
2113 Posts

Profile of Dennis Loomis
In case you havn't thought about it recently, calculators abound these days because a great many cell phones have calculators built in. Makes some of this math stuff a little easier to do in today's world.
Dennis Loomis
http://www.loomismagic.com
Itinerant Montebank
<BR>http://www.loomismagic.com
wayman
View Profile
Special user
England - Sunderland
588 Posts

Profile of wayman
Thanks Scott.

So
1. use the first 3 digits of your phone # = 123
2. multiply by 80 = 9840
3. add 1 = 9841
4. multiply by 250 = 2460250
5. now add the last 4 digits of your # +4567 = 2464817
6. repeat step 5 again = 2469384
7. subtract 250 = 2469134
8. now divide by 2 = 1234567

Ahhhhhh now I get it.

this only works if you do each equation separatley and not as one continuous sum.

ie not (123*80+1*250+4567+4567-250/2) wich would equal 19099

This was what I was doing wrong.
drkptrs1975
View Profile
Elite user
North Eastern PA
452 Posts

Profile of drkptrs1975
Here is a new twist, just have your friend do steps 1-6 and tell you their answer, you can do steps 7-8 in your head and tell them their phone number.
MRReed
View Profile
New user
Lake Odessa, MI
58 Posts

Profile of MRReed
Wayman --

Your calculation list...
(123*80+1*250+4567+4567-250/2)
...will work, but... if you remember the "operator precedence" from your grade school days, you must perform muliplications and divisions before additions and subtractions, so you simply need to add parentheses to your 'formula,' and it will work:
((((123*80)+1)*250)+4567+4567-250)/2)

This gets the precedence correct. An interesting anecdote re "operator precedence" follows.

One can prove that 1 = 0 algebraically by ignoring operator precedence, e.g.:

Set value of x to 1: x = 1
Set value of y to 1: y = 1
Equate: x = y
Multiple by x: x2 = xy
Subtract y2: x2 - y2 = xy - y2
Factor: (x + y)(x - y) = y(x - y)
Divide by (x-y): (x + y) = y
Subtract 1: x + y - 1 = y - 1
Substitute: 1 = 0
The Affordable Card Presses
1-, 2- and 4-deck Presses at Card Presses
dlhoyt
View Profile
Regular user
176 Posts

Profile of dlhoyt
Quote:
On 2004-03-19 08:42, MRReed wrote:
One can prove that 1 = 0 algebraically by ignoring operator precedence, e.g.:
<original edited slightly by me>
1)Set value of x to 1: x = 1
2)Set value of y to 1: y = 1
3)Equate: x = y
4)Multiply by x: x^2 = xy
5)Subtract y^2: x^2 - y^2 = xy - y^2
6)Factor: (x + y)(x - y) = y(x - y)
7)Divide by (x-y): (x + y) = y
8)Subtract 1: x + y - 1 = y - 1
9)Substitute: 1 = 0


This is not really due to operator precedence, but to division by zero in step 7. x-y = 0 and division by zero is undefined. It is undefined to avoid the kind of problem that this example represents; if allowed, you can prove that 1 = 0, a contradiction. Serious consequences would ensue, so don't attempt this at home.
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Magical equations » » Calculate phone number (0 Likes)
[ Top of Page ]
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2023 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved.
This page was created in 0.05 seconds requiring 5 database queries.
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café
are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic.
> Privacy Statement <

ROTFL Billions and billions served! ROTFL