|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 | ||||||||||
Scott Ocheltree![]() Veteran user 364 Posts ![]() |
I subscribe to both. Every now and then I think I should drop one, but I can never decide which. I enjoy Genii's depth and perspective, but I have actually gotten more usable material out of MAGIC. I don't add new effects very rapidly and I'm not a slieght junky, but MAGIC published Simon Aronson's "Random Sample Shuffle-Bored" which was worth a year's subscription. And I used a bank night variation published by Jim Steinmyer in MAGIC called "Playing For Keeps".
|
|||||||||
eryanic![]() Special user 683 Posts ![]() |
Get both first..then after that you can decide which one you prefer!
|
|||||||||
Peo Olsson![]() Inner circle Stockholm, Sweden 3261 Posts ![]() |
Magic get my vote, cause of its better read. I always start to read Michael Close's column.
But Genii isn't bad either, but Magic is better. that's it. I Think. Im sooooo slow on sundays.
Pictured to the left my hero and me during FISM 2006 in Stockholm.
|
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Books, Pamphlets & Lecture Notes » » Genii or Magic? (0 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2021 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.08 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < ![]() ![]() ![]() |