Oh, when I published someone's trick or routine in APOCALYPSE that had appeared in a book of his then, of course, I'd mention that book - where it made perfect sense to do so - and I couldn't get flack from others.

I think the Café community can understand this.

Such screams for attention would get very, very tiresome.

Miss your point, Tim - care to elucidate?

I'm lucky - I'm dyslexic. Lucky 'cause that made me a much better teacher/writer - I teach as if everyone is like me, no ambiguities, no reason for a reader to think "What does he mean?" Just trying to make it clear that I don't get your point, Tim. Please clear it up for me, and everyone else. Thanks. (See what I mean? There's no way to not understand what I'm asking, so it should be easy for you to respond.)

I asked you a question in a very polite and friendly tone. Just a curious question...that was all... And then you give me this:

"So, Magic-Daniel, have I explained myself clearly? Do you understand??!" And again....:

"So, again, Mr. Magic-Daniel, have I explained myself clearly? Do you understand??!! Have I assuaged your "curiosity" properly?

Is that how you normally corresspond online or in real life? Someone ask you a very polite and friendly question, and just because the questions dosen't "suit" you, you respond like the above? Really?

Magic-Daniel, what is wrong with asking you if you understand Harry's response. Does that mean you never want to be asked a question. It seems you think it is okay for you to ask questions, but not other. Why are you here if no one can carry-on a conversation with you. Very strange response from you to Harry, and very disrespectful, in my opinion. Notice, I asked no questions of you.

By the way, I guess some members here indeed do get the point in Tim's post.

I am not surprise to get that response from you, Bill. You have always have your very own and speciel way of communicating on the Café. That I of course only respect. Like, I respect Harry's way of communicating.

That is just not how I like to communicate with people. Online or live.

KevinKM99 said: "As for Apocalyspe...first book was pretty good (it's also sold out), but subsequent volumes left, shall we say, a lot to be desired. My opinion anyway."

My response to him re: that statement was deleted because I was much too harsh. I agree; I was; I got very annoyed. So let me respond in a "less harsh" way - Please pay no attention to obviously unknowledgeable MISLEADING, un-helpful, remarks, There - hope that's not too harsh and won't be deleted. I could list "lot's to be desired" items from those 15 years of APOCALYPSE - that I still use, that people all over the world perform - but it'd take too darn long and use up too many pages here.

Magic-Daniel: Sorry that you take my response to you so negatively. I "sensed" a bit of sarcasm in your post to me - if that is not the case you have my sincere apologies. And I did, really did, try to give you an intelligent answer as to why I don't "recommend."

Nicolino: If only "some" members here do get the point in Tim's post, perhaps you can explain that point to those who do NOT get his point, including me.

Thanks Harry for clearifying

Actually I didn't say I was one of those 'some', Harry.

But... having a close look at Tim's post, which obviously deals with some people's 'screams for attention' that would get 'very, very tiresome' makes me indeed recognise that behaviour in some people here. Don't you feel that way, too?

Why does it seem as if you and Tim are both "screaming for attention"? I can't find any other reason for your, and his, posts. Perhaps you can enlighten me - I'm obviously not as smart/intelligent/able to "recognize" as you two.