On Dec 9, 2015, nonprofitmagic wrote:
I think that a logical person would figure out this method, no? The spectator may not know exactly what is going on, but there is a process...and it can be "backtracked" in the mind...no?

Kevin

On Dec 9, 2015, Adrien Lochon wrote:

Quote:

On Dec 9, 2015, nonprofitmagic wrote:
I think that a logical person would figure out this method, no? The spectator may not know exactly what is going on, but there is a process...and it can be "backtracked" in the mind...no?

Kevin

Well... Yes, I guess everything can be backtracked, but Sync is VERY deceptive when presented properly and I don't think that it can EASILY be backtracked.

On Dec 9, 2015, Adrien Lochon wrote:
I prefer Ouija over Sync...So, all in all, there is some great thinking here, as I've come to expect from Fraser, but I guess I'll stick with Ouija

On Nov 19, 2015, BMWGuy wrote:
Hey guys,

Alex here.

I just received Fraser's latest offering called Sync, in being able to billetlessly and without any props, reveal the name of someone that they are merely thinking of.

After reading this, it reminds me of the Ouija origins, and how it all came together quite nicely, as well as traces of False Messiah thinking spread out as well.

This is definately worth taking a look at, if you enjoy Fraser's line of thinking, or have ever wanted to reveal billetlessly a person's name or place they had in mind.

If you bought Ouija or False Messiah in the past, this is a great addition to that, because it adds a layer of deception without the spectator having to say a single word.

This is thought provoking work that will "sync" into your performance, once you gain the basic idea and grasp the thinking behind this.

This is something that you can do anytime, anywhere, and blow some minds.

This does take some practice, so don't expect to be able to do this right away, especially if you have never read any of Fraser's work. If you have, and you know the way he thinks, then you will be able to pick this up in no time, and be up and running to the races.

All in all, this is a great tool to have and use at your disposal, and something that future performers can take advantage of.

Thanks Fraser

Alex Alejandro

On Dec 9, 2015, Adrien Lochon wrote:
So, I got this and although I find it very interesting and, as all of Fraser's works I had the pleasure of reading, extremely clever, I prefer Ouija over Sync.

I respectfully disagree with Pablo when he says Sync is more direct. The spectator "never saying a word" is kind of true, but I don't feel that point in particular makes the effect stronger. And the process in Sync is longer than Ouija, although it is still pretty fast.

So, all in all, there is some great thinking here, as I've come to expect from Fraser, but I guess I'll stick with Ouija

On Dec 9, 2015, TheGentlemanMindReader wrote:
Would Sync be similar to Ouija in the aspect which you will be correct about the name the vast majority of the time with some misses?

On Dec 10, 2015, Heka Siosiri wrote:

Quote:

On Dec 9, 2015, Adrien Lochon wrote:
So, I got this and although I find it very interesting and, as all of Fraser's works I had the pleasure of reading, extremely clever, I prefer Ouija over Sync.

I respectfully disagree with Pablo when he says Sync is more direct. The spectator "never saying a word" is kind of true, but I don't feel that point in particular makes the effect stronger. And the process in Sync is longer than Ouija, although it is still pretty fast.

So, all in all, there is some great thinking here, as I've come to expect from Fraser, but I guess I'll stick with Ouija

This is upsetting. I was tempted to get it with the false messiah bundle but it's still way too expensive in my opinion. I've never particularly loved the ouija method, what you wrote here convinces me to let it go I guess..

On Dec 10, 2015, Fraser Parker wrote:
I prefer the feel to the name guess in False Messiah, however Sync is perfect in terms of its simplicity and is a better method for divining any word thought of completely prop-less.

On Dec 14, 2015, nonprofitmagic wrote:
Your quote below says better method. BUT...your ad copy says perfect method. Is the ad copy accurate that this is the absolute perfect method?

Kevin

Quote:

On Dec 10, 2015, Fraser Parker wrote:
I prefer the feel to the name guess in False Messiah, however Sync is perfect in terms of its simplicity and is a better method for divining any word thought of completely prop-less.

On Dec 15, 2015, Michael Zarek wrote:
What would be better for guessing a single digit number, this or Ross's ''Abyss'' ?