|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4~5~6~7~8 [Next] | ||||||||||
Mike Webb New user 70 Posts |
Those delicious flavorings in e-cigs contain diacetyl, which has been known to cause Bronchiolitis obliterans.
I personally know of a magician who developed pneumonia from performing the illusion "Smoke." My co-worker's daughter developed bronchitis as a result of vaping. Believe what you want. Inhaling toxic chemicals, whether it's made by mother nature or man-made, is *never* a good thing health wise. Just my two cents... |
|||||||||
paw Loyal user 265 Posts |
||||||||||
algebraic Inner circle 1008 Posts |
Hopefully we'll have a review(s) shortly so things will return to a more civil matter.
|
|||||||||
Andre_Sant New user 10 Posts |
Hi,
i think that this product can be good only for magicans that usually works with a lot of public, or for video. infact the second spectator don't uderstand very well the act, and the first one could discover it easy. The show is for the rest of the people. So if you usually have a close up magic for only 1-2 person every time, it is not for you. If at the opposite you have a lot of public it is good. Than we must consider that you must pay other money for a lot of things: - every time you must buy new cards - I think that you must to create a special dress - some parts of the act are good only for camera, and for close up is not ok (same problems of 52 shades of red). I consider this act the most beautiful act in the world today, and I studied it a lot in the previous months. I know every part very well, and I know how he did every part. But for now never I made in a private show for the problems above. |
|||||||||
catweazle Special user 924 Posts |
Quote:
On May 15, 2016, Andre_Sant wrote: shock horror, what you describe there are instant stooges and duplicate cards... |
|||||||||
Andre_Sant New user 10 Posts |
Quote:
On May 10, 2016, danaruns wrote: i can confirm that Shin Lim does not use stooges ! 100% ! the only problem is that the second person will understand the trick if this person is not supid |
|||||||||
Andre_Sant New user 10 Posts |
Quote:
On May 15, 2016, catweazle wrote: no stooges ! |
|||||||||
catweazle Special user 924 Posts |
Which leaves....
|
|||||||||
korttihai_82 Inner circle Finland 1879 Posts |
Quote:
On May 15, 2016, Andre_Sant wrote: Not really... I think he/she might experience parts of the act little differently or be more suspicious about parts of it but most of the time he will be as fooled as rest of the audience. That said, most people are making their claims about stooges, dupes and such from Fool us performance and arent aware of that it has been cleaned up in the editing room. Its more on the lines of "what laymen would see in the act" and some "stuff" (very quick stuff though) happens out of camera or is just edited. But to compensate this one also has to remember that Fool us performance wasnt the final version of the act that is on sale now since the act was still used to tie FISM first price in card magic with Horret Wu and it was still in development while Fool us was filmed. There are bits and pieces in the act that are cleaner than what is seen on Fool us performance. J-M |
|||||||||
Andre_Sant New user 10 Posts |
The second person will undestand the trick only at the end of the trick if this person will speak with other spectators, or if this person will see again the show in a video.
so: if you have an high public it is ok, because also if 1 or 2 persons will understand the trick is not a big problem. but if you do the trick only for 2 persons it does not make sense |
|||||||||
Andre_Sant New user 10 Posts |
Every trick has got pro and cons.
the pro is that if you have a large public you will show a fantastic trick (the best one) the con is that there is an high probability to have 1 - 2 persons discover it after the trick |
|||||||||
shomemagic Inner circle Missouri 2232 Posts |
Im not wanting to do the complete act, there are just a couple things that interest me and I would like to learn those and use them if feasible.
|
|||||||||
Zuke Veteran user 353 Posts |
Quote:
On May 11, 2016, catweazle wrote: Ignorance of the highest order. Then again, a university degree or knowledge of the scientific method or grant application is not needed to post on a forum about magic tricks. |
|||||||||
DrIlluminatus New user 76 Posts |
You people can nit pick anything, and make speculation about things you don't know..............
Why I changed my handle and hardly post on the Café... Biased opinions and hack arm chair magician opinions.... With love Dr. Illuminatus |
|||||||||
catweazle Special user 924 Posts |
Quote:
On May 15, 2016, Zuke wrote: not at all, everything I said there is true. |
|||||||||
ASCII New user 59 Posts |
Quote:
On May 15, 2016, Andre_Sant wrote: what you just described is the definition of an instant stooge. |
|||||||||
Andre_Sant New user 10 Posts |
Quote:
On May 16, 2016, ASCII wrote: yes, but I think that the second person will understand only when the trick is finished, and when he/she will tell with other persons. --- to korttihai_82: yes this second person will understand only a part of the trick, but it is the core part |
|||||||||
Andre_Sant New user 10 Posts |
I think that 200$ is too much for amatorial magicans, but it can be ok for professional magicans with a large public.
If you can not afford 200$ I remember you that: - in: "shin lim at the table live lecture", he explains many things about this act (but not everything..) and he shows it again. (he explains a lot also about 52shades of red in the same lecture): 17,95 usd - in SSS FIRST EDITION (not 2015) he explains about the smoke from the mouth (you don't find it in sss 2015), and about the smoke from the table - in gone deck http://www.shinlimmagic.com/shop/gone-deck he explains about the transformation of the deck in a card - in the switch http://www.shinlimmagic.com/shop/the-switch he explains some other things (but you find it also in a table live lecture) In the table live lecture you find also the approach to the magic of Shin Lim In the Shin Lim youtube channel he inserts also another video of this "dream act". I think that you can have a better idea than the fool us performance |
|||||||||
mwolfire New user Mark Wolfire 91 Posts |
Anyone else notice that the mp4 file (both on-line version and download) is corrupted? The last segment 'freezes' in several places and will not play properly.
|
|||||||||
Saturn UK Inner circle 2646 Posts |
Quote:
On May 17, 2016, mwolfire wrote: You should try downloading again, I didn't notice any freezing.
www.saturnmagic.co.uk
#theshopwithstock Pleased to be different! FACEBOOK: www.facebook.com/saturnmagic.co.uk |
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Latest and Greatest? » » The Dream Act by Shin Lim (41 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4~5~6~7~8 [Next] |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.03 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |