|
|
Go to page 1~2 [Next] | ||||||||||
Rssudo New user 25 Posts |
So in the past I've frequently used stacks such as Stebbins and 8 Kings.
I want to start using a memorised deck and have chosen to start with The Magic Convention Set-Up by David Berglas. I'm aware of techniques to learn the deck in order, however how would I go about learning the cards alongside their corresponding numbers? Is there any technique to remember which number between 1 and 54 corresponds with which card, such that if one were to say 27 for example I'd know it corresponded with 9D without having to mentally go through the first 26 cards? Many Thanks, Rssudo |
|||||||||
Steve Burton Loyal user 258 Posts |
You might check out the first thread in this section, How to Use a Memorized Deck. Lots of useful information for those beginning to learn this area of card magic.
I use the Link and Peg System found in the last chapter of The Encyclopedia of Card Tricks. You create a word picture that corresponds to the number of the card in the deck. After you do that you'll always have the mnemonic reference for every card. After a while, you will automatically remember the card and location through rote. |
|||||||||
Waterloophai Inner circle Belgium 1369 Posts |
||||||||||
Harry Lorayne 1926 - 2023 New York City 8558 Posts |
The Link and Peg Systems are in The Encyclopedia of Card Tricks? I don't have, never read, that book. Fill me in, would you?
[email]harrylorayne@earthlink.net[/email]
http://www.harrylorayne.com http://www.harryloraynemagic.com |
|||||||||
Waterloophai Inner circle Belgium 1369 Posts |
In chapter 20 (last chapter) the Nikola system is indeed described. The book is a classic.
|
|||||||||
ddyment Inner circle Gibsons, BC, Canada 2501 Posts |
There are at least four commonly used methods to memorize value-position relationships. Each has its proponents and detractors. Each offers benefits and presents drawbacks.
I discuss all of this in some detail in my essay on the topic.
The Deceptionary :: Elegant, Literate, Contemporary Mentalism ... and More :: (order "Calculated Thoughts" from Vanishing Inc.)
|
|||||||||
Waterloophai Inner circle Belgium 1369 Posts |
If you want to learn more about the most used methods to learn a mem deck, the link above from Doug Dyment is indeed a very good source.
|
|||||||||
Harry Lorayne 1926 - 2023 New York City 8558 Posts |
Yeah, stay away from HOW TO DEVELOP A SUPER-POWER MEMORY, SECRETS OF MIND POWER, REMEMBERING PEOPLE (The Key To Success), MEMORY MAKES MONEY, SUPER MEMORY-SUPER STUDENT, THE MEMORY BOOK, AGELESS MEMORY, etc. (Oh, and the words Peg and Link are in that chapter, Waterloophai?
[email]harrylorayne@earthlink.net[/email]
http://www.harrylorayne.com http://www.harryloraynemagic.com |
|||||||||
Waterloophai Inner circle Belgium 1369 Posts |
I never wrote that they have to stay away from your books.
I just wrote that the Nikola system is described in the mentioned book. |
|||||||||
Rssudo New user 25 Posts |
Thanks guys!
Is the peg system similar to the system for memorising lists described at the beginning of the chapter of 13 steps about memory? Can't remember what it's called but it's the one where you have words from one to 30 that rhyme with the number? I haven't used it for magic but more for remembering long shopping lists 😂 Also I know Harry Lorayne has many books on memory, which books would be recommended of mainly wanted for memorising cards? Many thanks Rssudo |
|||||||||
alicauchy Veteran user Málaga, Spain 310 Posts |
Quote:
On Jan 2, 2018, Rssudo wrote: I used "How to develop a super-power memory" to learn Mnemonica in a couple of days (including the time to get familiar with the link and peg systems).
So much to do, so little time . . .
|
|||||||||
Steve Burton Loyal user 258 Posts |
I was surprised to learn just how old the memory system concept really is. Mnemonic principle's genesis appears to be Stanislaus Mink von Wennsshein, (Johann Just Winkelman) circa 1648 , this is known as the Major System of mnemonics. It was a way to remember numbers.
|
|||||||||
Harry Lorayne 1926 - 2023 New York City 8558 Posts |
If you'd like a bit of history of memory training go to memoryimprovement.org. Keep hitting "continue" until you come to that bit of history.
[email]harrylorayne@earthlink.net[/email]
http://www.harrylorayne.com http://www.harryloraynemagic.com |
|||||||||
Senor Fabuloso Inner circle 1243 Posts |
Cyclical stacks such as 8 kings and Stebbins are so popular because of how easy they are to learn and remember. While all memory work is worth learning and might even stay off dementia I don't see why learning anything complicated for a card stack is worth it? I'm old school where the simplest solution is usually the best one. Occam's Razor.
No matter how many times you say the wrong thing, it will NEVER be right.
If I'm not responding to you? It's because you're a TROLL! |
|||||||||
Ricardo Delgado Loyal user 230 Posts |
I thought Occam's Razor was only applied to develop theories and hypothesis.
It can be a lot of work to learn a stack up to "performance level", but I can see the differences it has compared to cyclical stacks. The instant knowledge of each card position, some effects built into it, and the "lack" of a recognizable pattern can all be advantages. But, it la ks the mathematical properties a cyclical stack has. In the end it sorts of depends what are you wanting to achieve, right? I don't think cyclical/mathematical stacks should be in the same category of memorizes stacks. They are different tools, although they share some similarities |
|||||||||
alicauchy Veteran user Málaga, Spain 310 Posts |
Quote:
On Jan 6, 2018, Senor Fabuloso wrote: Yes, it is a matter of personal choice. For me it is worth. It simply depends on whether you are willing to use the full power of a memorized stack (as stated by Ricardo) or not; moreover, the mnemonic system can be used as well in the "real world".
So much to do, so little time . . .
|
|||||||||
ddyment Inner circle Gibsons, BC, Canada 2501 Posts |
Ricardo Delgado opined:
Quote:
I don't think cyclical/mathematical stacks should be in the same category of memorizes stacks. This perpetuates a false dichotomy. Being a member of one group doesn't preclude membership in another. Cyclical/mathematical, or any other types of stack, should be in the same category as memorized stacks if they are memorized. Otherwise, not. There are, in fact, specific advantages to memorizing stacks that have additional useful properties.
The Deceptionary :: Elegant, Literate, Contemporary Mentalism ... and More :: (order "Calculated Thoughts" from Vanishing Inc.)
|
|||||||||
Ricardo Delgado Loyal user 230 Posts |
Quote:
On Jan 6, 2018, ddyment wrote: You are completely right. Any deck order can be a memorized stack if someone put in the work to memorize it. But I was referring to the exclusive properties of the cyclical stacks. And considering that Senor Fabuloso implied he doesn't memorize the stacks he use, then they are not memorized stacks, right? |
|||||||||
mlippo Inner circle Trieste (Italy) 1227 Posts |
I'm about to turn 53 and crazy enough to decide to delve into the memdeck world ...
In little less than a month, little by little, day by day, I feel quite confident with the first 26 cards on the Mnemonica stack. Now I'm stopping here for a while, because I want to keep on fixing into my mind the half stack, while starting to work on some of the routines in Juan Tamariz's great book which rely on only half stack. I didn't use any kind of memorizing techniques: just learnt card and position by heart, by sheer rote. What do you, more experts than me, think? Is it just one of the methods or in the long run, this method (which seemed to work fine for me so far) will show some disadvantages? Thanks Mark |
|||||||||
Ricardo Delgado Loyal user 230 Posts |
That's great Mark!
I don't really have a solid basis for this, but from the knowledge I've gathered reading about memory and memory systems, the only disadvantages of route memorization are the time, effort and lack of other relationships your brain have to remember. This last disadvantage is not really bothersome if you use that knowledge on a regular basis, but if you spend some time without practice, you may forget some things. If you don't want to delve into memory systems, the advices and techniques Tamariz offers on the book are really valuable: 1) make drawings on a deck of cards that will help you remember and relate the position to the specific card. 2) make a song about the positions and the cards. Make it silly and catchy. Record it and hear it some times. Sing along. It's silly, yeah, but that helps remembering. Those two points have helped me a lot. Other thing that helped me a lot: 3) make a cheat sheet. Take it with you. The Phoenix Bingo Cards can help. 4) practice sessions: shuffle, and put the deck in order. Then do it again. If you are in doubt, take a look at the cheat sheet. Do it again. And again. After you are confortable with it, start timing yourself. Last time I did it it took me 2min 50 sec. Not that great but I'm still trying to get it better. I think you will really like to work with the memdeck. |
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Shuffled not Stirred » » Memorising first deck (4 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page 1~2 [Next] |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.04 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |