We Remember The Magic Café We Remember
Username:
Password:
[ Lost Password ]
  [ Forgot Username ]
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » All in the cards » » Automatic Placement: Overkill vs The 32nd Sense vs The EP Principle? (0 Likes) Printer Friendly Version

ipe
View Profile
Veteran user
311 Posts

Profile of ipe
Originally posted in The Worker forum, I repost it here hoping for more participation. Smile

Hi everyone,
I'm deepening my study on the "Automatic Placement" principle.

I saw this principle implemented in John Bannon's "The 32nd Sense" (Move Zero Vol.3). I'm wondering whether Woody Aragon's "The EP Principle" and Paul Harris's "Overkill" are using the "Automatic Placement" principle too.

Here are a some differences between Bannon's effect and the other two:

- "The 32nd Sense" vs "The EP Principle". In "The 32nd Sense" the cards removed from the spectator are not added again to the deck and the order of the deck is not changed during the counting. Whereas in "The EP Principle" the counted cards are reversed and the removed cards are place on top of the deck.

- "The 32nd Sense" vs "Overkill". In "The 32nd Sense" you count from the top, whereas in "Overkill" you count from the bottom of the pile. This has a great impact on the overall effect: in "The 32nd Sense" you force an unknown chosen card to end up to a specific position, but in "Overkill" you are forcing a specific card.

Are all three effects based on the "Automatic Placement" principle? Are there other and different applications of this principle or are there other similar principles?

From a spectator point of view, "The 32nd Sense" and "The EP Principle" are the same effect. Which one do you prefer and why?

Thank you
What would a real mindreader do?
mantel
View Profile
Special user
678 Posts

Profile of mantel
I don’t know what the automatic placement principle is. However I am familiar with Overkill. That being what you described reminds me of Gene Finell ‘s Free-Cut Principle.

Cheers.
ipe
View Profile
Veteran user
311 Posts

Profile of ipe
Hi mantel, thank you for pointing me out the Free-Cut Principle, I didn't know and I think it is a little gem. ;-)

Regarding the automatic placement, I learn it in Move Zero Vol. 3 (John Bannon). In Move Zero you can find the principle implemented in the effect "The 32nd Sense" but there is also a stand-alone chapter all dedicated to the theory behind this principle.

Other sources for the automatic placement principle: https://www.conjuringarchive.com/list/category/722. (But I didn't read any of those books.)

Since you know Overkill, do you know the name of the principle behind it?

Lastly, I want to mention another principle similar to the automatic placement: the PM principle. You can read it freely here: http://mallofmagic.com/free%20stuff/PM%20Principle.PDF
What would a real mindreader do?
mantel
View Profile
Special user
678 Posts

Profile of mantel
I have sent you a private message
saxonia
View Profile
Regular user
122 Posts

Profile of saxonia
As you certainly already know, the original article where the name of the principle has been introduced was:
Ed Marlo's Automatic Placement in: New Phoenix, #329, August 1955, p. 126.

However, as you can see from the conjuringarchive references, the principle has been used before (some historical notes can be found in The Collected Works of Alex Elmsley, Vol. II, "Spell by the Numbers" (p. 349).

And one more child belonging to the same family is: "The Principle of Equal Piles" in Ramón Rioboó's "Thinking the Impossible" (p. 13).
ipe
View Profile
Veteran user
311 Posts

Profile of ipe
Hi Saxonia,
thank you for the references. Good, so the Woody Aragon's "The EP Principle" of which I speak in the opening post is a variant of the Automatic Placement.
What would a real mindreader do?
ipe
View Profile
Veteran user
311 Posts

Profile of ipe
Thanks to Mantel, I discovered that the principle in Overkill is the Clock Principle. Besides, the Clock Principle is a variant of the automatic placement principle.

So, at the end, as I have hypnotized in my opening post, all three effects (Overkill, The 32nd Sense and The EP Principle) are using the automatic placement principle (or variations of it).

Another similar principle is the Undo Principle (in Simon Aronson's Prior Commitment).

I think there is still much to explore!
What would a real mindreader do?
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » All in the cards » » Automatic Placement: Overkill vs The 32nd Sense vs The EP Principle? (0 Likes)
[ Top of Page ]
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2020 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved.
This page was created in 0.11 seconds requiring 5 database queries.
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café
are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic.
> Privacy Statement <

ROTFL Billions and billions served! ROTFL