The Magic Caf
Username:
Password:
[ Lost Password ]
  [ Forgot Username ]
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » The workers » » Help! Bert Allerton "Memorizing the Deck" (1 Likes) Printer Friendly Version

 Go to page [Previous]  1~2
curtiswallen
View Profile
New user
NY
63 Posts

Profile of curtiswallen
Completely agree, Danny. His ability to so successfully make the spectators believe he does not care about the cards, or what they do with them, but actually be in total control of everything always leaves me in awe.
supremefiction
View Profile
Veteran user
317 Posts

Profile of supremefiction
Quote:
On Aug 31, 2024, Dannydoyle wrote:
You don’t believe those are magicians?

The guy takes a deck of cards out if his pocket. Bicycles cards are not easy to get in Spain, not as common as in America. Most “civilians” don’t use them.


I didn't say I don't believe they are magicians. I said that they were civilians. Whether they are magicians or spectators, one guy followed the gaze and the other guy didn't.

You must be a blast to hang out with.
supremefiction
View Profile
Veteran user
317 Posts

Profile of supremefiction
Quote:
On Aug 31, 2024, curtiswallen wrote:
In response to supremefiction asking for thoughts/ideas...

I think for the more relaxed DaOrtiz style, the key is getting the cards out of your hands basically as fast as possible, to create maximum distance between the calling of the number and you picking the cards back up for the count. Some people will even say the number was called while the deck was sitting on the table.

In the DaOrtiz example, by the time most people process the number "27" he's already calculated the number of cards to move, sight counted, and shifted the cards. Then he spreads the deck a little as a gesture and drops it sloppily on the table while he pretends to think. That paints a very clear image of the cards sloppy on the table, far away from the magician, as he's thinking out loud "hmmm what card is 27? I'm not sure. maybe? yes! it's this one." So for the spectator, when the card is named the deck is in the middle of the table, then the magician very fairly picks it up and counts down to the card. I'd bet most people are expecting the move after the cards are picked up again, because how could he POSSIBLY have put the card in position when the deck is so far away.

For a more Darwin Ortiz-esque style of being a card master, always in control at all times, you could afford to slow down and deliver some patter to give you time to execute a pinky-count/buckle and shift invisibly, then count down without the cards ever leaving your hands.

----

A thought that just occurred to me that could work for a sloppy/relaxed style approach (probably stealing it from somewhere I don't remember, so if anyone knows please let me know)...

1) Ribbon spread the cards on the table to "memorize the deck," then flip over the spread and leave the cards on the table.
2) Have a position named.
3) Repeat the position out loud and ask the person if they're happy with that position? "27. You really can choose any number. Are you happy with 27?"
While you deliver the patter, scoop the cards up off the table, but "accidentally" forget the number you need to shift on the table. Only look at the cards long enough to sight the ones you need to leave on the table.
4) Pick the cards up you "forgot" and put them on top, or slap the deck onto the left over cards on the table if they need to go onto the bottom, and leave the deck openly on the table away from you.
5) Then do whatever you want to conjure the memory of the card in that position and do the reveal.

Glance at the cards long enough to get the count of the cards you need to leave behind, but then you should be able to do the pick up without even looking. That also gives cover for "forgetting" a few cards, because you were looking at the spectator, not at the cards. And if you do the action naturally and fluidly, even someone burning you will think you forgot the bottom cards then put them back on the bottom, or top on top. If you take out some cards now and try it, I think it's honestly pretty deceptive. The cards change from top to bottom, but look like they end up where they were supposed to be.


Very helpful, thank you. That is exactly the type of counsel I was hoping for.
Dannydoyle
View Profile
Eternal Order
21569 Posts

Profile of Dannydoyle
Quote:
On Aug 31, 2024, supremefiction wrote:
Quote:
On Aug 31, 2024, Dannydoyle wrote:
You don’t believe those are magicians?

The guy takes a deck of cards out if his pocket. Bicycles cards are not easy to get in Spain, not as common as in America. Most “civilians” don’t use them.


You must be a blast to hang out with.


Yes if using common sense is such a burden I’m sorry.

I deal in deception, I won’t deal in self deception. YMMV.
Danny Doyle
<BR>Semper Occultus
<BR>In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act....George Orwell
Nikodemus
View Profile
Inner circle
1345 Posts

Profile of Nikodemus
The reason I asked, what's wrong with the DaOrtiz move, was because SupremeFiction listed out a load of alternative ideas that - to me - were not good at all.
For example, saying you need to view a few cards to help you. I hate this sort of thinking (which is pretty much the opposite of Danni's approach). You make a very lame excuse, which then actually draws attention to precisely the thing you are trying to hide - the fact that you are moving some cards.
Or doing some Faros. How on Earth can you justify that? The effect is that you claim to have memorised the cards in the order just viewed. Then you SHUFFLE them before you are able to tell them the 27th card. This makes no sense whatsoever.
In situations like this, we need to remember how we want the spectator to perceive the effect. Not start clutching at straws.

Picking the cards up, and "accidentally" missing some, is a good idea. Just the sort of thing Danni does in fact. Actually I believe it's a very very old technique.

One simple idea to facilitate a casual transfer of up to 5 cards might be to pick up the deck, spread in the hands, and casually get a break under the top 5 cards and above the top 5, so you are kind of ready for whatever number they say.
Dannydoyle
View Profile
Eternal Order
21569 Posts

Profile of Dannydoyle
Absolutely how they perceive the effect is paramount.

Which is where he is VERY strong. The perception is he does nothing, and he doesn't even care what YOU do with the cards. This type of thing is incredibly strong misdirection and keeps people from successful backtracking. Heck they probably don't even TRY backtracking!

In the end that style looks pretty darn close to "magic".

I am not a fan of the way the personality of Tamriz has been duplicated by so many. (I was never a fan of that style to begin with.)
Danny Doyle
<BR>Semper Occultus
<BR>In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act....George Orwell
curtiswallen
View Profile
New user
NY
63 Posts

Profile of curtiswallen
Quote:
On Sep 1, 2024, Dannydoyle wrote:
Absolutely how they perceive the effect is paramount.

Which is where he is VERY strong. The perception is he does nothing, and he doesn't even care what YOU do with the cards. This type of thing is incredibly strong misdirection and keeps people from successful backtracking. Heck they probably don't even TRY backtracking!

In the end that style looks pretty darn close to "magic".

I am not a fan of the way the personality of Tamriz has been duplicated by so many. (I was never a fan of that style to begin with.)


I think you may have found your way to my original point.
Dannydoyle
View Profile
Eternal Order
21569 Posts

Profile of Dannydoyle
There is no doubt if this. I just dislike the jabbering like a maniac part. Both things can be true.
Danny Doyle
<BR>Semper Occultus
<BR>In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act....George Orwell
supremefiction
View Profile
Veteran user
317 Posts

Profile of supremefiction
Great ideas, thank you.

In Card Tricks with Trick cards by Bill Severn, a running feature in Legerdemain magazine

https://www.penguinmagic.com/p/S13785

Vol 1 pg 19, he has a similar trick. This idea is adapted from there.

Idea is, as the spec is choosing a number from one to 52, spread the cards in the hands. Then based on what he said, break under the requisite 1-5 cards on top or bottom and cut as needed. Could do a LePaul spread pass if the cards have to go top to bottom.

He uses double backed cards at 10 20 30 40 50, which are really not needed. However, he suggests a pencil dot on the upper right corners of the back of the the 10 20 30 40 50, which may help.

Possible but clumsy, I would have to check this out further.

Spread the cards in the hands and have the spec name the number. When they do, figure how many cards you need to displace. Count down to the number given by pushing off cards from left to right. Reduce the number of cards on top by culling cards from above the 10th card.

Also:

Maybe use a full deck biddle somehow to do the count from right hand to left hand and displace some card that way?
supremefiction
View Profile
Veteran user
317 Posts

Profile of supremefiction
I guess one could use a good old fashioned less-for-more or more-for-less full deck false count, but that seems to take some of the fun out of it.

Also, maybe a second deal--say they chose 32 and your target card is at 30, when you get to 30 deal two seconds. Necktie as needed.
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » The workers » » Help! Bert Allerton "Memorizing the Deck" (1 Likes)
 Go to page [Previous]  1~2
[ Top of Page ]
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved.
This page was created in 0.03 seconds requiring 5 database queries.
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café
are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic.
> Privacy Statement <

ROTFL Billions and billions served! ROTFL