|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 | ||||||||||
curtiswallen New user NY 63 Posts |
Completely agree, Danny. His ability to so successfully make the spectators believe he does not care about the cards, or what they do with them, but actually be in total control of everything always leaves me in awe.
|
|||||||||
supremefiction Veteran user 317 Posts |
Quote:
On Aug 31, 2024, Dannydoyle wrote: I didn't say I don't believe they are magicians. I said that they were civilians. Whether they are magicians or spectators, one guy followed the gaze and the other guy didn't. You must be a blast to hang out with. |
|||||||||
supremefiction Veteran user 317 Posts |
Quote:
On Aug 31, 2024, curtiswallen wrote: Very helpful, thank you. That is exactly the type of counsel I was hoping for. |
|||||||||
Dannydoyle Eternal Order 21569 Posts |
Quote:
On Aug 31, 2024, supremefiction wrote: Yes if using common sense is such a burden I’m sorry. I deal in deception, I won’t deal in self deception. YMMV.
Danny Doyle
<BR>Semper Occultus <BR>In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act....George Orwell |
|||||||||
Nikodemus Inner circle 1345 Posts |
The reason I asked, what's wrong with the DaOrtiz move, was because SupremeFiction listed out a load of alternative ideas that - to me - were not good at all.
For example, saying you need to view a few cards to help you. I hate this sort of thinking (which is pretty much the opposite of Danni's approach). You make a very lame excuse, which then actually draws attention to precisely the thing you are trying to hide - the fact that you are moving some cards. Or doing some Faros. How on Earth can you justify that? The effect is that you claim to have memorised the cards in the order just viewed. Then you SHUFFLE them before you are able to tell them the 27th card. This makes no sense whatsoever. In situations like this, we need to remember how we want the spectator to perceive the effect. Not start clutching at straws. Picking the cards up, and "accidentally" missing some, is a good idea. Just the sort of thing Danni does in fact. Actually I believe it's a very very old technique. One simple idea to facilitate a casual transfer of up to 5 cards might be to pick up the deck, spread in the hands, and casually get a break under the top 5 cards and above the top 5, so you are kind of ready for whatever number they say. |
|||||||||
Dannydoyle Eternal Order 21569 Posts |
Absolutely how they perceive the effect is paramount.
Which is where he is VERY strong. The perception is he does nothing, and he doesn't even care what YOU do with the cards. This type of thing is incredibly strong misdirection and keeps people from successful backtracking. Heck they probably don't even TRY backtracking! In the end that style looks pretty darn close to "magic". I am not a fan of the way the personality of Tamriz has been duplicated by so many. (I was never a fan of that style to begin with.)
Danny Doyle
<BR>Semper Occultus <BR>In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act....George Orwell |
|||||||||
curtiswallen New user NY 63 Posts |
Quote:
On Sep 1, 2024, Dannydoyle wrote: I think you may have found your way to my original point. |
|||||||||
Dannydoyle Eternal Order 21569 Posts |
There is no doubt if this. I just dislike the jabbering like a maniac part. Both things can be true.
Danny Doyle
<BR>Semper Occultus <BR>In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act....George Orwell |
|||||||||
supremefiction Veteran user 317 Posts |
Great ideas, thank you.
In Card Tricks with Trick cards by Bill Severn, a running feature in Legerdemain magazine https://www.penguinmagic.com/p/S13785 Vol 1 pg 19, he has a similar trick. This idea is adapted from there. Idea is, as the spec is choosing a number from one to 52, spread the cards in the hands. Then based on what he said, break under the requisite 1-5 cards on top or bottom and cut as needed. Could do a LePaul spread pass if the cards have to go top to bottom. He uses double backed cards at 10 20 30 40 50, which are really not needed. However, he suggests a pencil dot on the upper right corners of the back of the the 10 20 30 40 50, which may help. Possible but clumsy, I would have to check this out further. Spread the cards in the hands and have the spec name the number. When they do, figure how many cards you need to displace. Count down to the number given by pushing off cards from left to right. Reduce the number of cards on top by culling cards from above the 10th card. Also: Maybe use a full deck biddle somehow to do the count from right hand to left hand and displace some card that way? |
|||||||||
supremefiction Veteran user 317 Posts |
I guess one could use a good old fashioned less-for-more or more-for-less full deck false count, but that seems to take some of the fun out of it.
Also, maybe a second deal--say they chose 32 and your target card is at 30, when you get to 30 deal two seconds. Necktie as needed. |
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » The workers » » Help! Bert Allerton "Memorizing the Deck" (1 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.03 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |