|
|
Hypnotic Winter Special user Ireland 720 Posts |
Do you favour the old or the new or Boath, I've had people not want to even look at a book before just because the date was over ten years old.
I Find old books on magic and mentalism just as good as the new, in fact I use some of Houdinis origional magic. What inspired me to start this topic was, today I was just leafing through Corinda while having my lunch, every now and then I will go back and read some part of it and I came accrsos one of the most simple and ingenus card effects I've seen, these type of effects you pay a good deal for today. Has any one elese found the material in these old books as valuable?
When your only reality is an illusion, then illusion is reality.
|
mindhunter Inner circle Upstate NY 2280 Posts |
Just as much, if not in many cases more so. Much of the "new stuff" are permutations and elaborations of the older and not all are improvements.
Studying the older gems in Annemann, Corinda, et al. can be just as rewarding if not more so than picking up a recently published book. Bryn
Bryn D. Reynolds, Author of:
"The Safwan Papers" & "The LOGAR Scrolls" Mentalism ebooks - PM any interest. My artwork: https://darkmountainarts.com |
johne Special user 960 Posts |
I really enjoy the old effects HW...like you, I can pick up an old book and see some real gems that were hiding away last time I read it.
I think it is "The Young Magician's Handbook." This book is packed with effects. I can find something new every time I flip through it. I also has a nice section on mentalim. With "Practical Mental Magic" I try to only read through the effects, so I get more of a layperson's feel for the them. If I too quickly read the methods, I come across thinking it is too transparent to use. I really am fooling myself. The book is great. I like new reading and new ideas too. Idea on Billets really keep my interest since I do like to use my hands a lot still. John e. |
Mystery Loyal user 248 Posts |
I must confess that I work more with "old school mentalism".
The "new wave" has a lot to offer but psychological subtleties, Knepper stuff and building blocks aren't reliable enough yet to stand on their own, in my experience. Perhaps it's just me, because I'm not self-assured enough to pull it off, I don't know. But I think the old and new schools complement each other quite charmingly. I wouldn't care for a one-track mind in mentalism...
Let your dreams tear apart your life, before your life tears apart your dreams...
|
discjockey Elite user 451 Posts |
I would agree that "old school mentalism" didn't include psychological forcing and such. while I perform some of the new stuff, some of the books that pioneered mentalism (corinda, annemann, etc) are the ones that stick out. think about it: those books were like Knepper's back then. it was the huge craze for mentalists in their day. some worked then, but not today. just like maybe psychological forcing wont work in another fifty years. who knows?
|
Hypnotic Winter Special user Ireland 720 Posts |
I always feel that any sort of psyclogical methods using suggestion or otherwise should always be backed up by sure fire methods. for example if you bend a spoon in another persons and your suggestion as tho the tectile nature of the spoon do not take hoild at least you end up with a bent spoon which is still very impressive.
I mix the new with the old all the time, but the old always work but as we know in mentalism, is doesn't always have to ruen out 100 percent so you can get away with pure suggestion in my opinion.
When your only reality is an illusion, then illusion is reality.
|
Roth Inner circle The 18 5090 Posts |
As a couple posts suggested "the new is the old".
Many of Anneman and Corinda's effects have been updated and converted to modern day effects that are on the market today. There is a blackboard effect in Practical Mental Magic that was converted into a card deck routine that many of us have. |
mindhunter Inner circle Upstate NY 2280 Posts |
As Myster said, an awful lot of the current mentalism items offered for sale today use bits and pieces from these two works, and many are just minor reworking of the complete effect.
There is a lot of "new" mentalism to be learned from these old works if you dig enough and much is quite good. As an example, I took an original Annemann manuscript "3oth Century Television," which he even says was an older idea, and made it up using modern materials. It plays very well and if someone today were to "modernize" the gimmick as I did and market it it I have no doubt it would be described as "new & commercial!" in the ad when in reality it is about 100 yrs. old. Bryn
Bryn D. Reynolds, Author of:
"The Safwan Papers" & "The LOGAR Scrolls" Mentalism ebooks - PM any interest. My artwork: https://darkmountainarts.com |
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Penny for your thoughts » » Do you Favour old or new mentalism? (0 Likes) |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.01 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |