The Magic Café
Username:
Password:
[ Lost Password ]
  [ Forgot Username ]
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Penny for your thoughts » » Radio Magic (0 Likes) Printer Friendly Version

 Go to page 1~2 [Next]
Peter Loughran
View Profile
V.I.P.
Ontario, Canada
2683 Posts

Profile of Peter Loughran
I will appearing live on a Toronto based Radio station in late September and will be doing about 10-15 minutes spread out with commercials of magic done with listners at home. I have a program already for this type of media, however I would like to expand my techinques in this aspect. Is there any books anyone can recommend for me. Also is there a thread about this subject already? I did a cafe search but it was to vague to direct me to any specific posts regarding this topic.

Thanks,

P.
Brand New: - SNAKE BITE ILLUSION
www.masterofillusions.ca

Follow me on Facebook:
https://m.facebook.com/peter.loughran.9

Check out my new movie:
www.plasterrockmovie.com
www.globaluniversal.com

Also visit: www.l2fireworks.com
Glyn Coy
View Profile
New user
UK
38 Posts

Profile of Glyn Coy
Peter

If you haven't already, I would strongly suggest you check out Banachek's Radio Magic CD. It has tons on workable radio material, all of which is demonstrated through live recordings of it being performed.

You can buy it from:

http://members.aol.com/swells4691/
Peter Loughran
View Profile
V.I.P.
Ontario, Canada
2683 Posts

Profile of Peter Loughran
I heard about that, so you recommend it? I will check it out! Thanks. Any other suggestions will be appreciated!

P.
Brand New: - SNAKE BITE ILLUSION
www.masterofillusions.ca

Follow me on Facebook:
https://m.facebook.com/peter.loughran.9

Check out my new movie:
www.plasterrockmovie.com
www.globaluniversal.com

Also visit: www.l2fireworks.com
Darmoe
View Profile
Special user
Ohio
741 Posts

Profile of Darmoe
Peter

I highly recommend SB's tapes... lots of bang for the buck!

I must ask something though... are you promoting yourself as a "Magician" in these dates or "Psychic/Mentalist"?

I have serious pet peeves when it comes to Joe the Magician "borrowing" from the mentalist's arsenal, when it comes time to do a Radio spot. In short, I'm of the type that thinks a "Magician" needs to bolster his/her image as a "Magician" and leave the psi styled material to those of us specializing in Psi/Bizarre performances... As I've stated all too frequently, too many magicians are exploiting top end mentalism technology to their advantage and in doing so, deminish the power of novelty behind said effects, when presented at a distance, away from the idea of a "Magic Show" by a Psychic Entertainer... to my understanding, that is why groups like the PEA came into being and retain a great deal of technology... so as to preserve our art vs. allowing it to be overly commercialized and raped.

Pardon, I do not mean to "attack" you on this issue... just using your circumstances as a soap box I guess. Smile

REMEMBER... the first time Copperfield made a jet plane disappear for the public, it was on live L.A. Radio Smile (it worked very well... touch base with Glenn Falkenstien, he can give you some of the details.) The moral of this story is... give a strong narrative and you can make the listener believe just about anything is really happening. So you might consider going with the gusto! Smile
"I firmly believe that of all the Arts and Crafts of Mentalism, there is nothing more satisfying than one who is a first-class Reader. It is the ultimate in Mentalism..." - Tony Corinda * 13 Steps To Mentalism
Paul
View Profile
Inner circle
A good lecturer at your service!
4395 Posts

Profile of Paul
re;
The moral of this story is... give a strong narrative and you can make the listener believe just about anything is really happening. So you might consider going with the gusto!

My father tells me when he was young, one of the hit radio performers in the UK was a ventriloquist.

Being IN the studio rather than on a live link is better. I always thought Lorayne's Numero Uno (in his lecture notes)was a good one for the radio, the presenter finally counting out loud the cards you cut off the deck. Goldman's Mental Yarn can be done on the radio. I have used others but would rather not discuss them Smile

Paul.
Yaniv Deautsch
View Profile
Special user
Israel
529 Posts

Profile of Yaniv Deautsch
Well Peter,
Which tricks do you already use?
I might have some suggestions for you but i need to know first your level of exprience and knowledge in the area of long distance effects.

Yaniv Deautsch
Sid Mayer
View Profile
Special user
Santa Fe, NM
656 Posts

Profile of Sid Mayer
You might want to think about modifying one of the many card tricks that can be done over the phone. You can talk about having a friend named (whatever he needs to be named) who is particularly sensitive to your mental wavelength. Your "friend" will hear all he or she needs to know by listening to the broadcast.

Sid
All the world's a stage ... and everybody on it is overacting.
Darmoe
View Profile
Special user
Ohio
741 Posts

Profile of Darmoe
Quote:
On 2002-08-14 21:07, Sid Mayer wrote:
You might want to think about modifying one of the many card tricks that can be done over the phone. You can talk about having a friend named (whatever he needs to be named) who is particularly sensitive to your mental wavelength. Your "friend" will hear all he or she needs to know by listening to the broadcast.

Sid


Ted Lesley speaks of doing this in PARAMIRACLES and in my experience the is one of the best ways for a magician to gain advantage of Psi manifestations e.g. working with a local Mentalist... possibly as part of a challenge routine... say a two-person telepathy bit, or card identification or any one of a dozen other bits a "Team" can offer.
"I firmly believe that of all the Arts and Crafts of Mentalism, there is nothing more satisfying than one who is a first-class Reader. It is the ultimate in Mentalism..." - Tony Corinda * 13 Steps To Mentalism
xersekis
View Profile
Special user
591 Posts

Profile of xersekis
I agree with Craig about the magician borrowing form the mentalist for radio gigs. I recently told many magician friends of mine that in the middle of my act I don't appear doves nor do I dissappear a rabbit. I don't have silks appear and dissappear - so would they please stop doing mental stuff in between their illusions.

The room was filled with an icy cold and a dead silence Joh Edwards could't have warmed up. Will they stop - nah.

But I do think they should. Smile

Enjoy!
Rex
Peter Loughran
View Profile
V.I.P.
Ontario, Canada
2683 Posts

Profile of Peter Loughran
Thanks to all suggestions by all who contributed. I am not going to ruin any part of our art nor would I steal someone elses routine. I just wanted the references for techineque for my program that I am already doing.... After everything I have contributed to the magical arts and after 19 years in the biz, I wish I would get a little more credit than that. Anyway again thanks.

Smile
P.
Brand New: - SNAKE BITE ILLUSION
www.masterofillusions.ca

Follow me on Facebook:
https://m.facebook.com/peter.loughran.9

Check out my new movie:
www.plasterrockmovie.com
www.globaluniversal.com

Also visit: www.l2fireworks.com
xersekis
View Profile
Special user
591 Posts

Profile of xersekis
Best wishes for a great radio gig!

Enjoy
Rex
John Clarkson
View Profile
Special user
Santa Barbara, CA
749 Posts

Profile of John Clarkson
Quote:
On 2002-08-16 00:55, rex sikes wrote:
I agree with Craig about the magician borrowing form the mentalist for radio gigs. I recently told many magician friends of mine that in the middle of my act I don't appear doves nor do I dissappear a rabbit. I don't have silks appear and dissappear - so would they please stop doing mental stuff in between their illusions.



Gosh, have I missed something all these years? I thought mentalism was, in fact, illusions. Coin magicians can do card tricks; card men do coin tricks. Unless you really believe you are doing something OTHER than magic (read that as "bold deception") I guess I don't get your point. The magicians I know (and respect) make no bones about it: they deceive, and they do it in a way that entertains. The marvel is that people can suspend their disbelief. The spectators realize that what is essentially banal manipulation can produce an effect that mystifies. It is humbling and entertaining; magic reveals a lot about how we humans are put together. Why should it be any different for mentalists?

I think it would be just fine for mentalists to saw a woman in half as they read her mind... it might keep the whole thing in perspective.
:nose:
John D. Clarkson, S.O.B. (Sacred Omphaloskeptic Brotherhood)
Cozener

"There is nothing more important to a magician than keeping secrets. Probably because so many of them are Gay."
—Peggy, from King of the Hill (Sleight of Hank)
xersekis
View Profile
Special user
591 Posts

Profile of xersekis
No I have real powers. I eat when I am hungry and I sleep when I am tired.

It's just a matter of mixing jenre's.

Enjoy!
Rex
John Clarkson
View Profile
Special user
Santa Barbara, CA
749 Posts

Profile of John Clarkson
Quote:
On 2002-08-19 23:04, rex sikes wrote:
No I have real powers. I eat when I am hungry and I sleep when I am tired.

It's just a matter of mixing jenre's.

Enjoy!
Rex


Not sure that satisfying physiological needs is analogous. I guess I missed the rule forbidding mixing genres in the magicians' handbook.
Smile
John D. Clarkson, S.O.B. (Sacred Omphaloskeptic Brotherhood)
Cozener

"There is nothing more important to a magician than keeping secrets. Probably because so many of them are Gay."
—Peggy, from King of the Hill (Sleight of Hank)
Andy Leviss
View Profile
Inner circle
NYC
1179 Posts

Profile of Andy Leviss
Well, I was avoiding the topic, because we've been down that road sooooo many times, but there's a distinctive difference between mental magic and mentalism, which I believe is what Craig and Rex are alluding to. I've written on this extensively, as have many others, including Bob Cassidy and John Riggs.

Since I'm not in the mood to type it all out again, I'm going to reprint an excerpt from my book, Ramblings & Revelations, for you to see my detailed thoughts on the subject. Enjoy :o)

Quote:
A common mistake which many magicians make when dealing with mentalism related material is to ignore the fact that there is a huge difference between mental magic and mentalism. To understand what I'm talking about, let's start with a couple of easy definitions.

First, mental magic is quite simply a magic trick that simulates mind reading. When David Copperfield performs "Room Service", "Dream Vision", or "Graffiti Wall", for example, he's performing mental magic.

Mentalism, on the other hand, is the demonstration of what appear to be psychic powers without any apparent trickery (whether it is claimed as actual psychic powers or not is something I'll address later in this book). Some effects can be performed as either mental magic or as mentalism, while others are distinctly one or the other.

Mental magic can use unusual props or everyday objects (which is not to say that it should, but that’s another story altogether).

Mentalism, on the other hand, uses only everyday objects (excepting the occasional crystal pendulum or similar items, but these still fall somewhat in the category of everyday objects, albeit less common ones).

I know this seems like a subtle distinction, and it can be a bit confusing, so let me try to explain it with some examples. The classic effect "Mental Epic" is, in my opinion, clearly a piece of mental magic. While it seems to demonstrate mind reading, it uses a big, odd prop that practically screams "gimmicked". There's something hokey about it that suggests to an audience that trickery could be involved.

If, however, you apply the same one-ahead method to an effect using just ordinary slips of paper, you have something that can be either mental magic or mentalism, depending on the situation it's framed in. If it's done as part of a collection of magic tricks, it's mental magic, but if it's done as one of a series of demonstrations of "psychic powers", it's mentalism.

For an example of mentalism that cannot work as mental magic, look at psychological forces such as what make up a lot of Pure Effect. For those not familiar with the term, a psychological force is when the performer gives a choice to an audience member or members that is structured in such a way that a vast majority of people will make the same choice. One familiar example of this is asking someone to think of a number from 10 to 50 in with both digits are odd and both are different. A vast majority of people will choose 37 (with 35 being a close second). Things like this can be used to good effect in a mentalism performance, because they seem like pure mind reading -- nothing's written down, something is just thought of and the mentalist reads those thoughts.

The big problem here, which is what prevents this from being usable as mental magic, is that it's not 100% failsafe. As a magician, if it doesn't work, it looks like you goofed up. As a mentalist however, there's a totally different atmosphere relating to the suspension of disbelief. Failing once in a while actually reinforces what you are doing -- it makes it seem more real. If you were using trickery, the audience thinks, you wouldn't make a mistake. Since you're making a mistake, you must be doing it for real! Pretty neat, if you ask me. As a mentalist, you can even structure your performance so that this failure doesn't even look like a failure. Done properly, it just passes as if nothing was meant to happen -- the routine is structured so that if the answer you want is given, you end up with a miracle, and if it's not, you just move on and the audience never realizes you meant anything to happen. If you tried this in a magic show, though, you'd be busted.

To summarize all of this, mentalism and mental magic each are different creatures, and as such each has different needs. There's frankly a lot you can get away with in a mentalism show that you just can't in a magic show -- hell, for all intents and purposes you could take a wild guess in a mentalism show and (given the right presentation) not have a problem if it was totally off.

On the other hand, mental magic is okay with (well, again this is a question of personal taste) "proppy" effects, ones that use unusual items such as special drawing boards a la Mental Epic, or ghastly metal blindfolds and other bizarre gadgets. In a mentalism show, however, these would feel "off" and totally out of place. It's incredibly important to define what you're performing so that you can effectively choose the right material for it.

That's it for this little rant, so think about it, and next time you talk about mentalism, take a second to see if that's what you're talking about, or if you really are referring to mental magic.


(Note that I've edited some side discussions out of this article from how it originally appeared in my column at Visions and how it appears in the book; my apologies if I've mucked up any of the clarity in making those edits, as I wanted to conserve space here on the board)

In other words, though, the problem is that the genres don't overlap as closely as some think; I think genre may not even be the right word. Mental magic is a genre of magic; mentalism, however, is a closely related but different art.
Note: I have PMs turned off; if you want to reach me, please e-mail [email]Andy.MagicCafe@DucksEcho.com[/email]!
Sid Mayer
View Profile
Special user
Santa Fe, NM
656 Posts

Profile of Sid Mayer
You might look for Steve Shaw's "Radio Magic" volumes 1 and 2. It consists of two one hour audio tapes. Volume 1 covers "The Business of Radio Magic." Volume 2, called "Explanations," deals with a number of suitable effects and presentations of a mostly mental nature.

The copyright is dated 1989 by Scott Wells. It was produced by Magic Inspirations, 14506 Silver Lace Lane, Houston, TX 77070.

I don't know if this is still available.

Good luck,

Sid Mayer
All the world's a stage ... and everybody on it is overacting.
John Clarkson
View Profile
Special user
Santa Barbara, CA
749 Posts

Profile of John Clarkson
Andy wrote:
[quote]... but there's a distinctive difference between mental magic and mentalism, which I believe is what Craig and Rex are alluding to....

Quote:
A common mistake which many magicians make when dealing with mentalism related material is to ignore the fact that there is a huge difference between mental magic and mentalism. To understand what I'm talking about, let's start with a couple of easy definitions.

...

Mentalism, on the other hand, is the demonstration of what appear to be psychic powers without any apparent trickery (whether it is claimed as actual psychic powers or not is something I'll address later in this book). Some effects can be performed as either mental magic or as mentalism, while others are distinctly one or the other.
...

Mentalism, on the other hand, uses only everyday objects (excepting the occasional crystal pendulum or similar items, but these still fall somewhat in the category of everyday objects, albeit less common ones).

I know this seems like a subtle distinction, and it can be a bit confusing...

...


On the one hand, you say the difference is huge; on the other you say it is subtle. I have trouble reconciling those concepts. I think the difference you describe is not enough to classify mentalism as a field outside of magic. Your distinction between mental magic and mentalism seems to be how subtle your deception is, how normal looking your "props" and how good your "outs." Sounds like magic to me. If you want to distinguish, I guess that's OK. Cardmen also distinguish between "the real work" and gaffs. One might require more talent and practice, but they are both magic. I think there is a danger that we might take ourselves too seriously. We are, after all, simply fooling people in an entertaining way (and with their implied consent). That's all. Some do it with double lifts; others do it with a center tear and sleight of mouth. I think it would be fine to do it with all of the above.
Smile
John D. Clarkson, S.O.B. (Sacred Omphaloskeptic Brotherhood)
Cozener

"There is nothing more important to a magician than keeping secrets. Probably because so many of them are Gay."
—Peggy, from King of the Hill (Sleight of Hank)
mastermindreader
View Profile
V.I.P.
Seattle, WA
12589 Posts

Profile of mastermindreader
Quote:
Your distinction between mental magic and mentalism seems to be how subtle your deception is, how normal looking your "props" and how good your "outs." Sounds like magic to me.


You're really just describing the difference between good and bad magic. The difference between mentalism and mental magic is far more substantial.

I'll follow Andy's lead here and quote myself from "Theories and Methods":

Quote:


Both mentalism and mental magic are forms of entertainment. Neither is more inherently entertaining than the other.

Pure mentalism looks exactly the same as what I would call “pure magic” (best typified by the performances of David Blaine,) that are very direct and seemingly impromptu. They tend to defy logical explanation and actually appear to real magic. In both cases, many members of the audience may believe they just saw “the real thing.”

Mental magic and most theatrical magic are also indistinguishable. Both are obviously illusions or special effects, which are visually or intellectually interesting, but nonetheless are generally perceived to be tricks by even marginally intelligent audiences.

HOW TO TELL IF YOU ARE DOING MENTAL MAGIC OR MENTALISM:

Pay attention to what audiences generally ask after seeing you perform. Do they ask things like:

“How is that done?’
“Can you show me another trick?”
“My five year old has a birthday coming up, what do you charge?”

If your answer is “yes,” you are doing mental magic, which is best described as “effects with a mind reading theme, which are, nonetheless, perceived to be magic tricks.” They do not create the illusion of the “real thing.”

If, on the other hand, you have succeeded in creating the illusion of mentalism, you will receive responses like these:

“Did you learn that somewhere, or is it something you were born with?”
“How did you know that?” (as opposed to “How did you DO that?”)
“Get away from me, man. Don’t be messin’ with my head!”

Mentalism and mental magic, then, are different forms of entertainment. Both elicit different perceptions and reactions from an audience. The mentalist, therefore, has an ethical responsibility unknown to the conjuror or mental magician, for he is in a position to make people believe in, and rely upon, to their detriment, his alleged powers.


Best Regards-

Bob Cassidy
Darmoe
View Profile
Special user
Ohio
741 Posts

Profile of Darmoe
Smile Did I stumble into a philosophy class? Smile

Love your thinking Bob! (Andy already knows what I think of him )
"I firmly believe that of all the Arts and Crafts of Mentalism, there is nothing more satisfying than one who is a first-class Reader. It is the ultimate in Mentalism..." - Tony Corinda * 13 Steps To Mentalism
Andy Leviss
View Profile
Inner circle
NYC
1179 Posts

Profile of Andy Leviss
Hmm. I wonder if I could pull off a directed study course for my spring semester here at Emerson--"Philosophy of Mentalism". Cassidy, Brown, Corinda, etc. could be the texts. Heck, I could probably even scam them into letting me use my own book as a text. This might have potential ;o)
Note: I have PMs turned off; if you want to reach me, please e-mail [email]Andy.MagicCafe@DucksEcho.com[/email]!
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Penny for your thoughts » » Radio Magic (0 Likes)
 Go to page 1~2 [Next]
[ Top of Page ]
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2020 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved.
This page was created in 0.28 seconds requiring 5 database queries.
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café
are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic.
> Privacy Statement <

ROTFL Billions and billions served! ROTFL